People v. Dixon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
The defendant was convicted on two counts of perjury and from the judgment and order denying his motion for new trial he prosecutes this appeal.
Appellant was the driver of an ambulance which was in an intersection collision resulting in an action for damages. That action was tried twice and in each trial appellant was a witness. He testified as to the speed of the ambulance on the first trial: “I can’t—cannot, so I can’t give a definite speed because I was not looking at the speedometer, but I would estimate that the car was doing between 20 and 30 miles an hour.”
Referring to Frederick, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. HousmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. Phillips.California Court of Appeal · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. SagehornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. GuastiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Commonwealth v. GilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- People v. RoubusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. McCaslinNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.