Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Housman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1941No. Crim. 2154PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted on two charges of perjury, two charges of offering false evidence and two charges of preparing false evidence.

On August 30, 1939, two complaints were filed in the municipal court of San Francisco, each charging the defendant with having violated section 1-d of the State Narcotic Act (Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act No. 5323) which provided that any doctor authorized to issue prescriptions for narcotics must keep a record of the name and address of the person to whom issued, the date when issued, the character and quantity of the drug prescribed and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. ChadwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Jay v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Sobey v. MolonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. People v. CasanovaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Lugo IrizarrySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
  4. Commonwealth v. KlingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. People v. Di GiacomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API