Disciplinary Bd. of the Supreme Court of the State of N.D. V. Bolinske (In re Bolinske)
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
[¶1] Robert Bolinske, Sr., objects to Disciplinary Board Hearing Panel's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation that he be suspended from the practice of law for 30 days and pay $5,000 restitution to both Mark Carter and Gary and Teresa Watson. Bolinske argues the hearing panel erred by finding he violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a), 1.15(e), and 1.16(e) and recommending he be suspended. We conclude clear and convincing evidence does not support finding Bolinske violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a) and 1.15(e). We conclude clear and convincing evidence established Bolinske…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. FelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.