Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Hann
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] Attorney Camille O’Kara Hann objected to a report of a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board recommending Hann be suspended from the practice of law and pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings. We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence Hann violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a), fees; 1.15(a) and (c), safekeeping property; 1.16(e), declining or terminating representation; 3.3(a)(1) and (3), candor toward the tribunal; and 8.4(c), misconduct. We order Hann be suspended from the practice of law for six months and one day and pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Barron v. CountrymanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Ryan v. Butera, Beausang, Cohen & BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. PiazzaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- In re SatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Disciplinary Board v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. McDonaghNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.