Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Lee

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2013No. 20130017PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Disciplinary Counsel objected to a report of a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board that concluded Ervin Lee had violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(b) and (c) and 1.15(a), (d), and (e), and that recommended Lee be suspended from the practice of law for 60 days and pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding in the amount of $7,147.51. We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence Lee violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(b) and (c) and 1.15(a), (d), and (e), but there is not clear and convincing evidence Lee violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a) or N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 1.2A(2) or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AskewNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Disciplinary Board v. AskewNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the North Dakota v. MoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. StenslandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. OverboeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Judicial Conduct Commission v. CorwinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Disciplinary Board v. KellingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API