Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield Heights
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 2002No. 2001-1325PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} On April 10, 2002, we granted a writ of mandamus to relators, co-owners as trustees of land located in the city of Mayfield Heights, Ohio, to compel respondents, the city and its mayor, city council, and planning commission, to commence appropriation proceedings to determine the amount of the city’s temporary taking of relators’ property. State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts. (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 59, 765 N.E.2d 345. We held that relators established a compensable taking of their property because the city’s application of U-l(l) and U-2-A single-family residential zoning classifications…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State ex rel. Coles v. GranvilleOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Duncan v. Village of MiddlefieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.