Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Duncan v. Village of Middlefield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2008No. 2008-0877PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandamus to compel a village, village council members, and village planning and zoning commission members to commence an appropriation proceeding to determine the amount of compensation to be awarded for an alleged taking of property. Because appellant has not established a compensable taking, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

{¶ 2} Appellant, Richard A. Duncan, owns real property in appellee village of Middlefield, Ohio. The property is zoned for general commercial uses, including Duncan’s planned use of the property as a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Wyatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Nakoff v. Fairview General HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State Ex Rel. Schachter v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. DillardOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State Ex Rel. Greene v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API