Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Coles v. Granville

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2007No. 2006-1259PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an original action for a writ of mandamus to compel a park district’s board of commissioners to commence appropriation proceedings for property allegedly seized and occupied by the district. Because relators have established that by constructing and using a recreational trail the board has taken the property, we grant a writ of mandamus to compel the board to begin an appropriation proceeding to compensate relators for the taking.

The Canal Company and the Railroad Lease

{¶ 2} In 1827, the General Assembly chartered the Milan Canal Company (“the canal company”) to construct and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Kramer v. Time Warner IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Grava v. Parkman Twp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State of Ohio Ex Rel. Boggs v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. State ex rel. Nickoli v. Erie MetroParksOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n v. ByrdOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Gilmour Realty, Inc. v. City of Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API