Schellhouse v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.
For the reasons which follow, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this case for a new trial. The difficulty faced by the trial court, the court of appeals, and now this court, stems from the failure to follow Civ.R. 49 in the trial of this case. Our analysis starts at that point.
This case was submitted to the jury as a set of five interrogatories, with no instruction or form given the jury directing it to return a general verdict. This resulted in what is known as a “special verdict.” See Black’s Law Dictionary (6 Ed.1990) 1560.
*524Civ.R. 49(C) commands that “[sjpecial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Calmes v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Staff Builders, Inc. v. ArmstrongOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- O'Connell v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadOhio Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by23 opinions
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. SaidOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Niskanen v. Giant Eagle, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Wightman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- Lambert v. ShearerOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Estate of Beavers v. KnappOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.