Motorists Mutual Insurance v. Said
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The current action presents for our review the following issue: what is the appropriate standard for demonstrating that an insurance carrier acted in bad faith in withholding payments due the insured under a policy of insurance. Specifically, we must examine the jury instructions to see whether the trial court erroneously defined “bad faith.”2 Because of the apparent *694frequency with which this type of claim is being asserted, and the confusion over what may constitute a basis for such a claim, we conclude that it is necessary to clarify the standard upon which bad faith is predicated under…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Francis v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.