Legal Opinion

Motorists Mutual Insurance v. Said

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1992No. 90-2285PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The current action presents for our review the following issue: what is the appropriate standard for demonstrating that an insurance carrier acted in bad faith in withholding payments due the insured under a policy of insurance. Specifically, we must examine the jury instructions to see whether the trial court erroneously defined “bad faith.”2 Because of the apparent *694frequency with which this type of claim is being asserted, and the confusion over what may constitute a basis for such a claim, we conclude that it is necessary to clarify the standard upon which bad faith is predicated under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Francis v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API