Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1991No. 90-34PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

We are confronted primarily with two issues of law in this appeal. The first is whether appellant has waived any challenge she might have relating to the jury’s answers to the submitted in*229terrogatories by failing to make a timely objection. The second issue presented for our determination is whether the trial court properly entered judgment in favor of the railroad based on the jury’s answers to the interrogatories.

I

We begin our analysis by considering whether appellant, by failing to timely object, has waived any error in the alleged inconsistencies in the jury’s answers to the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Schade v. Carnegie Body Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Fernandez v. ChardonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  4. Tennessee Consolidated Coal Company and Grundy Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  5. Reichert v. IngersollOhio Supreme Court · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Berge v. Columbus Community Cable AccessOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Bobb Forest Products, Inc. v. Morbark Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Eberly v. A-P Controls, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API