Wightman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
We affirm the lower court decisions on the evidentiary matters in this case. We find that the punitive damages award with remittitur is not excessive and is constitutional. We reverse the lower court on the issue of appealability of a remittitur and adopt the “Wisconsin rule” on that issue. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering a remittitur. Finally, we reverse the lower court on the issue of relief from post-judgment interest on a punitive damages award.
Evidentiary Issues
We find that the trial court acted within its discretion in granting the motions in limine…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Villella v. Waikem Motors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Peters v. Ohio State Lottery CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Hollins v. ShafferOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Harris v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue SheildOhio Supreme Court · 2002
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.