Legal Opinion
United States v. Friedland
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 31, 2001No. CIV.A. 96-N-1213PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
NOTTINGHAM, District Judge.
This is a CERCLA action. Third-Party Plaintiff Industrial Constructors Corporation (“ICC”) requests that I find the following as a matter of law: (1) Plaintiff United States is a record owner of real property or mineral interest at the Sum-mitville Mine site; (2) the United States’ ownership interest at the Summitville Mine qualifies it as an “owner” within the meaning of section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C.A. § 9607 (West 1995 & Supp.2000); (3) the United…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Western Mining Council v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. Asarco Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2003
- Chevron Mining Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Federal Resources Corp.District Court, D. Idaho · 2014
- In Re Kaiser Group International, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- United States v. GurleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.