Legal Opinion

Chevron Mining Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 19, 2017No. 15-2209PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge.

Under the federal environmental laws, the owner of property contaminated with hazardous substances or a person who arranges for the disposal of hazardous substances may be strictly liable for subsequent clean-up costs. In this case, the United States owned national forest lands in New Mexico that were mined over several generations by Chevron Mining Inc. The question we must resolve is whether the United States is a “potentially responsible party” (PRP), see, e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 9620(e)(6)', for the environmental contamination located on that land.

We conclude that under…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Trinity Industries Inc v. Greenlease Holding CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Navajo Nation v. DalleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. Galeano-Romero v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  5. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company v. TCI Pacific CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API