Chevron Mining Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge.
Under the federal environmental laws, the owner of property contaminated with hazardous substances or a person who arranges for the disposal of hazardous substances may be strictly liable for subsequent clean-up costs. In this case, the United States owned national forest lands in New Mexico that were mined over several generations by Chevron Mining Inc. The question we must resolve is whether the United States is a “potentially responsible party” (PRP), see, e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 9620(e)(6)', for the environmental contamination located on that land.
We conclude that under…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Trinity Industries Inc v. Greenlease Holding CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Navajo Nation v. DalleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Galeano-Romero v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Cyprus Amax Minerals Company v. TCI Pacific CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.