Legal Opinion

United States v. Gurley

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided March 2, 2004No. 3:00 CV 077 SMRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

STEPHEN M. REASONER, District Judge.

This Court conducted a hearing on Plaintiffs right to reimbursement of response costs incurred or to be incurred at the Gurley Pit Site and South 8th Street Superfund Sites located in northeast Arkansas. The Court finds the United States is entitled to response cost at the Gurley Pit Site in the amount of $13,986,-191.94 1 , plus interest from July 24, 2002 until the date of judgment, plus post judgment interest at the rate of 1.23% until paid. The Court also finds the United States is entitled to response costs at the South 8th Street…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. R.W. Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. New Castle County Rhone-Poulenc, Inc., Zeneca, Inc. v. Halliburton Nus CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. United Technologies Corporation v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. General Electric Company v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc. And Litton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Followell v. United StatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
  2. In Re Dana Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. Gurley v. CITY OF WEST MEMPHIS, ARDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007
  4. United States v. GurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. William M. GurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API