Legal Opinion
United States v. Federal Resources Corp.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided July 14, 2014No. Case No. 2:11-cv-00127-BLW-RCTPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS
RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judge.
The history of Idaho is heavily influenced by the discovery and mining of rich mineral deposits. Though vital to the development and settlement of the region, mining left behind significant waste. This case concerns who is responsible for the cleanup.
The United States brought this action against Federal Resources Corporation (FRC), the Blum Real Estate Trust (Blum Trust), Bentley J. Blum (Blum), and Camp Bird Colorado, Inc. (CBCI). At its core, the United States’ Second Amended Complaint, Dkt. 204, seeks recovery of funds incurred by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Robert Downs v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Chevron Mining, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- United States v. Federal Resources Corp.District Court, D. Idaho · 2015
- Orange Co. Water Dist. v. AlcoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Orange County Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global FastenersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.