In Re Commitment of Frankovitch
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, J.
¶ 1 Appellant Paul Frankovitch appeals from the trial court’s denial of his two petitions for release and to change his status as a sexually violent person (SVP). He challenges the court’s findings that the state had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that his mental disorders have not changed, that he continues to have serious difficulty controlling his behavior, that he remains a danger to others, and that it is highly probable he will engage in acts of sexual violence if he is discharged. We affirm.
¶ 2 After a jury trial in 1999, Frankovitch was found to be an SVP as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. CartaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Felipe v. Theme Tech Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- In re the Detention of FoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State ex rel. Arizona Department of Health Services v. GottsfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- David Garcia v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.