Legal Opinion

In Re Commitment of Frankovitch

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 22, 2005No. 2 CA-MH 2004-0005-SPPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, J.

¶ 1 Appellant Paul Frankovitch appeals from the trial court’s denial of his two petitions for release and to change his status as a sexually violent person (SVP). He challenges the court’s findings that the state had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that his mental disorders have not changed, that he continues to have serious difficulty controlling his behavior, that he remains a danger to others, and that it is highly probable he will engage in acts of sexual violence if he is discharged. We affirm.

¶ 2 After a jury trial in 1999, Frankovitch was found to be an SVP as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  5. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. CartaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. Felipe v. Theme Tech Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. In re the Detention of FoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Arizona Department of Health Services v. GottsfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. David Garcia v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API