Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Rudy Tham
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1992No. 90-10573PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
A federal jury convicted Michael R. Tham for attempting to corruptly influence United States District Judge Stanley A. Weigel. Also convicted were Tham’s co-conspirators: ex-crime figure Abraham Chalupowitz, alias “Trigger Abe” Chapman, and United States District Judge Robert P. Aguilar. 1 Tham was found guilty under 18 U.S.C. § 1503 for the substantive offense of endeavoring to influence the due administration of justice, and under 18 U.S.C. § 371 for both conspiracy to defraud the United States and conspiracy to influence the due administration of justice.
Tham appeals…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Stanley Mills StanertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Julius L. EchelesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leaburn ALEXANDER, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Carl Wesley Thomas v. Paul BibleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. RudeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. BauerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.