Legal Opinion
June v. Roberts
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 1986No. SC S33122PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an original proceeding to review a ballot measure explanatory statement. Pursuant to ORS 251.215, respondents Kafoury, Marbet, Achterman, Frewing and McFarland filed with the respondent Secretary of State a purported explanation of a state initiative measure designated as Ballot Measure No. 14. The full text of the explanatory statement as filed with the Secretary of State is as follows:
“This measure halts the operation of an existing nuclear fueled thermal power plant in Oregon until the Energy Facility Siting Council finds that the Federal Government has licensed a repository for…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Homuth v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995