Legal Opinion

June v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1986No. SC S33122PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding to review a ballot measure explanatory statement. Pursuant to ORS 251.215, respondents Kafoury, Marbet, Achterman, Frewing and McFarland filed with the respondent Secretary of State a purported explanation of a state initiative measure designated as Ballot Measure No. 14. The full text of the explanatory statement as filed with the Secretary of State is as follows:

“This measure halts the operation of an existing nuclear fueled thermal power plant in Oregon until the Energy Facility Siting Council finds that the Federal Government has licensed a repository for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Homuth v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API