Legal Opinion

McKee v. Neilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 16, 1968No. 41594PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

The parties have the same relative positions in this court as they had in the lower court. They will be referred to by their trial court designation of “plaintiff” and “defendant.”

Plaintiff filed suit against defendant alleging two causes of action for consequential damages accruing to plaintiff by reason of a collision in the intersection of two county roads between an automobile operated by his wife and an automobile driven by an employee of the defendant. The jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff on both causes of action. The lower court granted defendant a new trial on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ross v. CuthbertOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Lakeview, Inc. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Sisemore v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Cosmo Construction Company v. LodenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Savoia v. FW Woolworth Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Maidman v. StaggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Laws v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. GRISHAM v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  5. Cimarron Feeders, Inc. v. Tri-County Electric Coop, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API