Yoast v. Sims
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower' court; plaintiff in error, as defendant, and defendant in error, as plaintiff.
In the latter part of June, 1924, the d’e- I fendant employed Roy Sims, the son of plaintiff, to work as a drillman’s helper in the operation of a mineral prospect drill rig, and on July 23. 1924, while helping to change a bit he was struck on or about the right knee and injured, but continued i» work for the defendant for about two weeks, and thereafter went to work for Alver Mitchell I and worked for him until October 17, 1924, j and on January 25th…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Martin v. LillyIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Standridge v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Hollis v. United States Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Walters v. Appalachian Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Beasley v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Temple v. DuggerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Houston v. PettigrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Fike v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.