Howden-Goetzl v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
Petitioners seek a writ of mandate to compel respondent court to set aside its order expunging a notice of lis pendens or to increase the amount of the undertaking from $10,000 to $670,000.
Petitioners are plaintiffs in a shareholders’ derivative action on behalf of Educational Securities Corporation (ESC), attacking a refinancing transaction and foreclosure proceeding whereby the defendants (real parties herein) obtained title to ESC’s major asset, a proprietary hospital.
Under the refinancing transaction, real party Western Urban Redevelopment Corporation and High-Far…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Palmer v. FixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Ronga v. AlpernNew York Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by7 opinions
- United Professional Planning, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Peery v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Trapasso v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Stewart Development Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- California-Hawaii Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.