Legal Opinion

Howden-Goetzl v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1970No. Civ. 27580PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, J.

Petitioners seek a writ of mandate to compel respondent court to set aside its order expunging a notice of lis pendens or to increase the amount of the undertaking from $10,000 to $670,000.

Petitioners are plaintiffs in a shareholders’ derivative action on behalf of Educational Securities Corporation (ESC), attacking a refinancing transaction and foreclosure proceeding whereby the defendants (real parties herein) obtained title to ESC’s major asset, a proprietary hospital.

Under the refinancing transaction, real party Western Urban Redevelopment Corporation and High-Far…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Palmer v. FixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ronga v. AlpernNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United Professional Planning, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Peery v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Trapasso v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Stewart Development Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. California-Hawaii Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API