Blume v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action for false arrest and malicious prosecution, alleging that she was unlawfully arrested pursuant to defendant Fred Meyer’s policy of randomly checking for receipts. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff awarding her compensatory damages of $25,000 and punitive damages of $450,000. Defendant appeals. We affirm.
Plaintiffs claim arose from an encounter at about 6:30 p.m. on May 22, 1995, at the Hollywood West Fred Meyer store in Northeast Portland. At the time of the incident, plaintiff, an African-American, was 26, and lived in Portland with her mother.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- James K. Lee v. Michael EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Kraemer v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Harris v. SoleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- MacCrone v. Edwards Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.