Legal Opinion
Carroll v. EL DORADO ESTATES DIV. NO. 2 ASS'N
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1984No. 7827PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
680 P.2d 1158 (1984)
James A. CARROLL, James Adkins and Guy Whitney, Appellants,
v.
EL DORADO ESTATES DIVISION NUMBER TWO ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
No. 7827.
Supreme Court of Alaska.
April 6, 1984.
Charles D. Silvey, Schaible, Staley, DeLisio & Cook, Inc., Fairbanks, for appellants.
James S. Magoffin, Jr., Fairbanks, for appellee.
Before BURKE, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this case an incorporated association of condominium owners brought suit to enforce a bylaw of the association which bans residential possession of animals, i.e., pets. The court granted summary…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Rego v. DeckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Blum v. LatterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Klein v. Scranton Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Lee v. KonradAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- LeDoux v. Kodiak Island BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc. v. State of Alaska, Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC, and Flint Hills Resources, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2023