Legal Opinion

LeDoux v. Kodiak Island Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1992No. S-3997PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellee, Kodiak Island Borough (Borough), sued the LeDouxs to enjoin them from using their property as a professional office building in violation of the Borough’s minimum parking regulations. The trial court granted the Borough’s summary judgment motion. The LeDouxs appeal. We affirm.

II. FACTS

Joel and Carol Davis owned property in Kodiak. The property was zoned for multifamily residential use. The LeDouxs wanted to buy the property and use it as a combination law office and apartment. In October 1987, the Davises applied for a zoning variance to use the property as a…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Buoy v. ERA Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hausam v. WodrichAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Thorstenson v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Municipality of Anchorage v. HigginsAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Tenala, Ltd. v. FowlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Mortvedt v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Bridges v. Banner HealthAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API