Legal Opinion

Lee v. Konrad

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2014No. 6948 S-14503/S-14524PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Cody Lee and Stacey Dean (collectively referred to as "Lee") and Barbara Konrad dispute the boundary between their lots in an Anchorage subdivision. Lee insists that the boundary line was established by a 1992 survey, which Lee later marked with fence posts. Konrad argues that a survey she commissioned after purchasing her lot in 2008 disclosed the true boundary and that encroachment of fill material caused by Lee along the fenceline between the lots was a trespass. The superior court concluded that Konrad's survey correctly identified the boundary line…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Diehl v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Environmental Processing Systems, L.C. v. Fpl Farming Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Sanders v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Guerrero v. GuerreroAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State of Alaska, Office of Lieutenant Governor, Division of Elections, and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an official capacity v. Alyse S. GalvinAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. McCavit v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API