Lee v. Konrad
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Cody Lee and Stacey Dean (collectively referred to as "Lee") and Barbara Konrad dispute the boundary between their lots in an Anchorage subdivision. Lee insists that the boundary line was established by a 1992 survey, which Lee later marked with fence posts. Konrad argues that a survey she commissioned after purchasing her lot in 2008 disclosed the true boundary and that encroachment of fill material caused by Lee along the fenceline between the lots was a trespass. The superior court concluded that Konrad's survey correctly identified the boundary line…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Diehl v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Environmental Processing Systems, L.C. v. Fpl Farming Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
- Sanders v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Guerrero v. GuerreroAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Alaska, Office of Lieutenant Governor, Division of Elections, and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an official capacity v. Alyse S. GalvinAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- McCavit v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.