Legal Opinion

Manning v. Clark

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 5, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

89 So.2d 339 (1956)

Ross MANNING, doing business as Ross Manning Carnivals, Appellant,

v.

Arthur L. CLARK and Joe Baker, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

September 5, 1956.

Anderson & Nadeau, Miami, for appellant.

Daniel Sepler and Boyce F. Ezell, Jr., Miami, for appellees.

ROBERTS, Justice.

This is the fourth appearance of this cause before this court. See Manning v. Clark, Fla. 1951, 56 So.2d 521; Fla. 1952, 62 So.2d 352; and Fla. 1954, 71 So.2d 508, for a history of the litigation.

Briefly stated, the facts are that the appellees, Clark and Baker, filed a suit in equity…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Parker v. Brinson Construction CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. General Supply & Construction Co. v. GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Burger v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Berloni SpA v. Della Casa, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. SCM Associates, Inc. v. RhodesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Law v. Blue Lagoon-Pompano, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Caribank v. FrankelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API