Legal Opinion

Lundstrum v. Lyng

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1991No. 89-1372PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, Douglas D. Lundstrum, appeals from the dismissal for failure to state a claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of his suit against defendants Richard Lyng, the Secretary of Agriculture; Calvin Lutz, Michigan Director of the Farmers Home Administration (FMHA); Russell Keech, District Manager for FMHA; David W. Steeby, County Supervisor for FMHA; the FMHA itself; and the United States of America. On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the district court erred *1144in its determination that (1) there is no private right of action against the United States for violation of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. John Keith Blakely and John Emmett Long v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Muniz-Rivera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. Charles E. Buck v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. Simeon v. DoeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  5. Joseph E.L. Sullivan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API