Legal Opinion
Charles E. Buck v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1992No. 91-3597PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff Charles E. Buck1 appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to set aside the district court’s previous judgment dismissing this case for lack of prosecution. No plaintiff appealed from the final judgment of dismissal, and the only question before us is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion to set the judgment aside. In deciding this question, we must examine the complaint and amended complaint to determine whether these pleadings present*604ed one or more meritorious…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Coin Meter Company, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad, a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Shepard Claims Service, Inc. v. William Darrah & Associates, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Sam L. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Ashbrook v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- William Harmon v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Juan Reyes, Juan A. Acevedo, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Louella W. Barber v. Marvin Runyon United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Coleman v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Philips Medical Systems International B v. V. Martin E. BruetmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.