Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1998No. B107900PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MASTERSON, J.

Under Penal Code sections 1305 and 1306, once a criminal defendant’s bail has been forfeited and he has remained at large for more than 180 days, summary judgment may be entered against the surety of the bail. In this case, a motion requesting that the 180-day period be tolled was filed before the 180 days had expired, but was granted afterward. Summary judgment was then entered. The trial court denied the surety’s subsequent motion to set aside the summary judgment, even though it had been entered during the period contemplated by the tolling order. We do not reach the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. County of StanislausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. People v. Topa InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. National Automobile & Casualty Ins.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. People v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. TAYLOR BILLINGSLEA BAIL BONDSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API