Legal Opinion
People v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance
California Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 2010No. S175907PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
We granted review to resolve a conflict between the Second and Third District Courts of Appeal. At issue is when a motion for relief from forfeiture of bail must be made if an absconding defendant is arrested or surrendered in a county other than the jurisdiction where the case is pending. We hold that such a motion must be filed within 180 days of forfeiture, unless the time is extended as the governing statute permits.
I. BACKGROUND
Robert Laimbeer repeatedly failed to appear in Los Angeles County Superior Court on charges of driving with a suspended license and without…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. Allegheny Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 2007
- County of Los Angeles v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. LeivaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. Accredited Surety Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Roy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Martin v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.