Legal Opinion

People v. TAYLOR BILLINGSLEA BAIL BONDS

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1999No. B122170PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CURRY, J.

Appellant Taylor Billingslea Bail Bonds appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion under section 1305.4 of the Penal Code 1 to extend the period within which forfeiture of a bond can be vacated or the bond exonerated after that period had already been extended more than 180 days. Appellant also contends that this court should apply a 1999 amendment to section 980 retroactively, and deem the bond exonerated for failure of the criminal defendant’s arrest warrant to appear in the National Criminal Information Center computer system (hereafter NCIC). We conclude that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. People v. DurbinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. County of Los Angeles v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. County of San Bernardino v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. Financial Casualty & SuretyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. Granite State InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Williamsburg National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. United States Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API