Legal Opinion
People v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 16, 2011No. E050297PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, J.
Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company (hereafter the surety) appeals an order denying its motion to set aside the forfeiture of a bail bond. It contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to order forfeiture of the bond because it failed to do so on the first occasion when the bailee failed to appear without excuse.
We will affirm the order.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The case arose as follows. On May 18, 2007, the surety issued a bond in the amount of $75,000 warranting the appearance of Shawn Jason Bergman to answer felony charges in connection with an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. ZapienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. Safety National Casualty Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. North River Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. International Fidelity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Co. of Los Angeles v. Financial Casualty & SuretyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- County of Yolo v. American Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.