Legal Opinion

State v. Gallimore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 1968No. 421PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The first question of law presented by the appeal is the sufficiency of the bill of indictment in No. 13,410 to charge the crime of conspiracy. The objection is that at least one other conspirator, in addition to the defendant, should be named in the bill because of the nature of the crime. “A conspiracy is the unlawful concurrence of two or more persons in a wicked scheme —the combination or agreement to do an unlawful thing or to do a lawful thing in an unlawful way by unlawful means. (Citing many cases.)” State v. Goldberg, 261 N.C. 181, 134 S.E. 2d 334; State v. McCullough, 244 N.C. 11,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. State v. . WhitesideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. LooneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API