Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Ben Pekin Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 4, 1971No. 18894PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Per curiam
This application by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its order presents the issue of whether substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that Walter Churinoff was discharged for participating in protected concerted activity in asking, “Is there a pay-off here” when he failed to receive an anticipated increase in wages. We find that substantial evidence exists in the record to support the Board’s finding and its conclusion based thereon that the respondent engaged in an unfair labor practice prohibited by Section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act (29…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Thor Power Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Indiana Gear Works, a Division of the Buehler Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Duncan Foundry and MacHine Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. PIE Nationwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. The National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cement Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Aro, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.