Legal Opinion

State v. Shippee

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 31, 1975No. 6714PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The only question before us is whether this indictment should have been dismissed for lack of evidence to support it. The indictment was under RSA 590-AT-3 (Laws 1967, 346:1), the statute in force at the time of the alleged offense. State v. Morin, 111 N.H. 113, 115, 276 A.2d 476, 477 (1971). So far as material here, it charged that the defendant “did act as a lookout” for her husband while he committed a burglary to which he later pleaded guilty.

At the close of the State’s case, the defense moved for a directed verdict and dismissal on the ground that no evidence had been introduced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CanneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  2. State v. PalumboSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. State v. MorinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. State v. LaineySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. State v. VaillancourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. State v. VaillancourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API