Legal Opinion

State v. Lainey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 11, 1977No. 7698PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction under RSA 635:1 for the burglary of Roland’s Variety Store in Nashua in the early morning of December 12, 1975. The issues here are the propriety of the severance of the charge of burglary from the charge of committing a crime when armed with a revolver, RSA 159:2, and certain evidentiary rulings in the course of trial before a jury. All questions of law raised by defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by the Trial Court (Goode, J.).

Defendant argues first that the trial court erred in granting the state’s motion to sever the two indictments…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BlakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  3. Bourget v. Public Service CompanySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953
  4. State v. BroughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. State v. WhitneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. State v. RamosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. State v. WindersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. State v. FecteauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API