Legal Opinion

State v. Vaillancourt

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 30, 1982No. 81-291PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The only issue presented in this case is whether the Trial Court (Wyman, J.) erred in ruling that the indictment against the defendant was sufficient on its face. We hold that the court’s ruling was erroneous, and we reverse.

The factual backdrop of the case involves an attempted burglary on the morning of December 8, 1980, at the O’Connor residence in Manchester. On that day, a neighbor observed two young men, allegedly the defendant, David W. Vaillancourt, and one Richard Burhoe, standing together on the O’Connors’ front porch. The men were ringing the doorbell and conversing with one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ThresherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. State v. ShippeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. EtzweilerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. State v. TherrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. State v. MerrittSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. State v. ArilloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. State v. EtzweilerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API