Legal Opinion

State v. Vaillancourt

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 30, 1982No. 81-291Published

1Opinion of the Court

122 N.H. 1153 (1982)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

v.

DAVID W. VAILLANCOURT

No. 81-291.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

December 30, 1982.

Gregory H. Smith, attorney general (James D. Cahill, III, attorney, on the brief and orally), for the State.

James E. Duggan, appellate defender, of Concord, by brief and orally, for the defendant.

2Per curiam

The only issue presented in this case is whether the Trial Court (Wyman, J.) erred in ruling that the indictment against the defendant was sufficient on its face. We hold that the court's ruling was erroneous, and we reverse.

The factual backdrop of the case involves an…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ThresherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. State v. VaillancourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. State v. ShippeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API