Farmers & Merchants' Bank v. De Shorb
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Action to foreclose a mortgage. Plaintiff has judgment, from which and from the order denying a new trial this appeal is taken. The court found, as to the note and mortgage, that on March 24, 1896, J. de Barth Shorb and appellant, who were husband and wife, executed their joint and several promissory note to plaintiff for the sum of $164,-000, and at the same time jointly executed the mortgage upon which this action is brought, for the purpose of securing the same; that the note and mortgage were executed freely and voluntarily by appellant, and for a valuable consideration; that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Harlan v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- California National Bank v. GintyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Farmers' Natl. Gold Bank v. StoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Chase v. EvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bank of Commerce, Ltd. v. BaldwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Rohrbacher v. AitkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Heinrich v. HeinrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Ettlinger v. Connecticut General Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Granger v. HarperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.