Legal Opinion
Farmers' Natl. Gold Bank v. Stover
California Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1882No. 7,623PublishedCited by 26 opinions
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Superior -Court of Santa Clara County.
1Opinion of the Court
McKee, J.:
Action to recover balance due upon the following promissory note:
“ $2,000. San Jose, December 24, 1877.
“ On March 24, 1878, at three o’clock P. M., on that day (no grace), for value received, in gold coin of the Government of the United States, we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of Farmers’ National Gold Bank, in this city, two thousand dollars, with interest from date at the rate of 1¿ per cent per month until paid, payable monthly; both principal and interest payable alike in gold coin.
“ H. Stover,
“ Luther & Schroeder.”
Stover made default: Luther & Schroeder plead:…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnet v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Pierson v. McCahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- National Bank of Auburn v. . LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Peters v. FossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Connalley v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Roemer v. Retail Credit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Walsh v. MckeenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.