Legal Opinion

Granger v. Harper

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 13639PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure a promissory note signed by the defendants Henry Harper and H. O. Langstaff. A deficiency judgment was entered against the defendant Langstaff, who alone was personally served in the action. The defendant Langstaff appealed.

Issues were raised by the answer to the complaint based on the appellant’s contentions that he signed the note as surety only; that the plaintiff knew that he signed as surety and consented to accept him as such; and that the subsequent taking by the creditor…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. . GurneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Harlan v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. California National Bank v. GintyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Farmers' Natl. Gold Bank v. StoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Figari v. OlceseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mead v. Sanwa Bank CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Ciria v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  3. Logtale, Ltd. v. CantonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API