Legal Opinion

Lamoreaux v. Fosket

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1954No. 32709PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schwellenbach,

J.—Donald D. LaMoreaux, individually, and as guardian ad litem, commenced action against Reverend S. E. Fosket and wife, for damages sustained by his infant daughter, Christie Lou, when she was run over and injured by an automobile driven by Rev. Fosket. At the close of the testimony, the trial court, feeling that no negligence had been proved, directed a verdict in favor of defendants. This appeal -follows.

A challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, a motion for nonsuit, or a motion for a directed verdict, admits the truth of the plaintiff’s evidence and all inferences rea*251so…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ludberg v. BarghoornWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Comer v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  3. Kennett v. FedericiWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Lee v. Independent DairyWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Olsen v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Deer Park School District No. 414Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Fink v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. System Tank Lines, Inc. v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hemmen v. Clark's Restaurant EnterprisesWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Freimuth v. Glens Falls InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API