Legal Opinion

Hogenson v. Service Armament Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1969No. 39855PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an action for personal injuries, the almost total loss of eyesight in one eye, which occurred when plaintiff was firing an old rifle using ammunition salvaged from the Spanish-American War and subsequently sold to plaintiff by defendant. The action was based on both negligence and breach of warranty. The jury in the trial court awarded damages to the injured party for $130,000. This appeal followed.

Curtis Hogenson was something of a gun buff. He already had two rifles and a shotgun when he saw an advertisement in a gun magazine offering for sale a .43 caliber Remington Rolling Block…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kavanagh v. ButoracIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Kramer v. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Walsh v. West Coast Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Kavafian v. Seattle Baseball Club Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. St. Germain v. Potlatch Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Bingaman v. Grays Harbor Community HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lyons v. Redding Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. John Mileski, an Infant Over the Age of 14 Years, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Edward Francis Mileski v. The Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. State v. WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Ryan v. WestgardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API