Twin Peaks Canning Co. v. Industrial Commission of Utah
Utah Supreme Court
Original application by tbe Twin Peaks Canning Company and tbe London Guarantee & Accident Company, Limited, for a writ of review to tbe Industrial Commission to review an award under tbe Workmen’s Compensation Act in favor of Editb Bobling on account of tbe death of ber minor son, Charles Brandley.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
This is an original application to this court for a writ of *591review. The application is made pursuant to tbe provisions of chapter 100, Laws Utah 1917, as the same is carried into Comp. Laws Utah 1917, §§ 3061 to 3165, inclusive, and as amended by chapter 63, Laws Utah 1919.
One Edith Bohling made application in due time and form to the Industrial Commission of Utah, hereinafter called Commission, to obtain compensation for the death of her son, one Charles Brandley, who was 14 years and 10 months of age at the time of his death. The Commission awarded the mother compensation as a partial…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Phil Hollenbach Co. v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Coronado Beach Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Judson Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Hulley v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- M & K Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948
- Christensen v. DysartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.