Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Railway Co. v. Cannon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 17, 1946No. 32700PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURST, V.c;j;.'This is an original proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of the respondent; Bill Cannon, against the petitioner, Oklahoma Railway Company, which carries its own risk. There is no question as to the nature and extent of the injury sustained. The only question presented is whether the injury arose out of and in the course of the employment of the respondent.
The State Industrial Commission found the facts as follows:
“That on January 29, 1946, the claimant was in the employment of the respondent as a driver and operator of a motor driven bus or…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- R. J. Allison, Inc. v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Farmers Gin Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Burchfield v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Edwards v. Louisiana Forestry CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Green v. De FuriaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Weidenbach v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- White v. Milk Producers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- The Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. Edward E. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.