Legal Opinion
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Harper
California Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1939No. L. A. 17226PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendant Moses, whose demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend. A purported appeal also has been taken from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to file an amended complaint.
From the allegations of the complaint on file herein, it appears that some time prior to the filing of the instant action, at the instance of the defendant Moses and his employer, the West American Finance Company, the plaintiff surety com pany had issued a fidelity bond in a sum not to exceed $10,000, under the terms of which the surety…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- West American Finance Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Windt v. CovertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Armstrong v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Hays v. HousewrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Central Towers Apartments, Inc. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- R. P. Richards, Inc. v. Chartered Construction Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Potter v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- Scott v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.