Legal Opinion

Windt v. Covert

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1907No. S.F. No. 3114PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

On April 27, 1893, the defendant executed and delivered to plaintiff her promissory note in the sum of twenty-two hundred dollars, payable six months after date. At the same time, and as security for the payment of said note, said defendant, Mary I. Covert, purchased from one Brown a parcel of land in the county of Alameda and caused Brown to execute a conveyance thereof to the plaintiff. This action was commenced on the twenty-fifth day of October, 1897, and by his complaint the plaintiff, treating the conveyance of the land to himself as a mortgage, sought a decree of foreclosure.

At the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Woodard v. HenneganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Banta v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Pacific Trust Co. TTEE v. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Howell v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Pool v. GatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Lamberson v. BashoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API