Legal Opinion
Potter v. Richards
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 1955No. Civ. 20445PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment of dismissal as to defendant Inglewood General Hospital, predicated upon the sustaining without leave to amend of demurrers, both general and special, to the fifth amended complaint in an action to recover damages for wrongful “death and personal injuries, plaintiff appeals. *
The fifth amended complaint is a plethora of words, a marvel of redundancy and a masterpiece of prolixity.
Analyzing the pleading, it discloses the following:
Paragraph I: Contains merely a general allegation of residence of the parties.
Paragraph II: Embraces the usual allegations respecting persons sued by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Bixby v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Dunn v. DufficyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Steiner v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Berkley v. DowdsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Golden v. DunganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Smith v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Archuleta v. Grand Lodge Etc. of MacHinistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.