Erickson v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Baraga. (Haire, J., presiding.) Garnishment proceedings. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff brought an action in justice’s court against the principal defendant, and by garnishee summons against the railway company. Disclosure was made, but subsequently the defendant in the original action obtained a judgment against the plaintiff, and the justice issued a release, discharging the garnishee from liability. Plaintiff seasonably appealed from the judgment against him in the principal action, giving the garnishee notice thereof, and subsequently recovered a judgment against the principal defendant of $41.89 and costs. Immediately thereafter the circuit court, upon motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clap v. BellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Sherrod v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Chase v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- N. B. Brown & Co. v. TuppenySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Danforth v. RupertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Seattle Trust Co. v. PitnerWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Nelson v. KittelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- Kayser v. Farmers & Mechanics' BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1898